The above scanners offer both types of scanners, each more than suitable for home scanning photos. There’s no right answer, and there’s an option for every budget out there. We recommend choosing based on your needs and requirements. They also tend to be larger machines than their feed-through counterparts but offer better quality scans and higher dpi counts, which is why professionals and enthusiasts prefer them. However, they do come with some compromises, chiefly in the resolution department, which often translates to overall lower quality prints.įlatbed scanners, or the more traditional design, are better suited for damaged or delicate photos. Feed-through scanners are generally faster and easier to use if only for their efficiency when scanning many photos. As with most consumer electronics, you can always spend more money, but for non-professional use, there’s really no sense in breaking the bank for features that simply won’t be used.įlatbed and feed-through scanners each have their place when it comes to photo scanning. This focus led us to settle on five different photo scanners that should suit most users’ home photo scanning needs. Budget also played an important role, and we focused very much on photo scanners that offer the best bang for the buck, but with quality very much at the forefront of our decision-making process. We focused on the core features that separate scanners from one another: resolution, typically measured in dpi scan quality scan speed ease of use and design, notably size and footprint.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |